PDA calls for ‘broader debate’ on P med self-selection

PDA calls for ‘broader debate’ on P med self-selection

A ‘broader debate’ is needed on the issue of self-selection of Pharmacy (P) medicines within the pharmacist profession, the Pharmacists’ Defence Association (PDA) has insisted.

And it has launched a survey of its members to hear their views on the topic.

Related Article: Drug price concessions hit record high for third consecutive month

Paul Bennett, RPS chief executive, told The Pharmacist today that the RPS welcomed the wider interest ‘in this important topic of professional practice’.

‘This is why we are calling for evidence to help have an informed discussion about our future policy in this area,’ he said.

Related Article: Exclusive: CPE pushes for new service caps to avoid ‘over commissioning’ draining the contract sum

But the PDA suggested in its statement published yesterday that for the RPS ‘to even re-consider’ its stance on the issue was ‘premature and disingenuous’.

It said that when the cross-sector Supervision Practice Group had met to discuss how elements of medicines preparation, assembly, sale and supply could be delegated, it concluded that on P medicines specifically, ‘further work would need to be undertaken in consultation with the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA)’.

The PDA said that 'despite the unexpected nature' of the RPS's call for evidence, it was 'ready and insists that a broader debate within the profession must take place if substantial proposals on changes to practice are being considered'.

Related Article: Pharmacists concerned they will see ‘very little’ of contract funding boost

Its survey of PDA members is open until 2 August and will help inform the PDA’s views. 'All pharmacists are encouraged to have their say in this crucial debate,' the PDA said.

Want news like this straight to your inbox?
Register for full access to the site and our bulletins
Have your say

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.