ARRS linked to reduced prescribing, study suggests

ARRS Reduces Prescribing And Boosts Patient Satisfaction, Study Finds

GP practices with more staff employed through the additional roles reimbursement scheme (ARRS), including pharmacists, have 'lower' prescribing rates, a study has suggested.

Published in the British Journal of GPs (BJGP), The effects of ARRS staff in England on prescription patterns and patient satisfaction, found that the hiring of ARRS staff was ‘significantly associated’ with lower prescription rates and higher patient satisfaction.

The study found that practices with more ARRS staff had lower prescribing rates for all prescriptions, including statins, analgesics and antibiotics, but they were particularly low for mental health medications.

Related Article: How new medicines become available on the NHS

And it recognised that pharmacists were 'by far the most common [ARRS] role'.

The study also found that overall patient satisfaction was high, with patients especially satisfied with the management of long-term conditions.

The researchers from the Universities of Oxford and Bristol also found that ARRS staff tend to be hired in large practices and those with a shortage of GPs. They were also more common in surgeries with a greater number of overseas-trained GPs.

The study concluded the scheme had ‘potential to have a positive role in primary care’ because of the reduced prescribing and high patient satisfaction.

But the study authors warned that further research was needed to explore the long-term effects of ARRS on primary care, including patient outcomes and health care costs, and the potential barriers to its implementation.

Related Article: Weight loss jabs and the role of community pharmacy

Additional research was also required to test the link between ARRS and the findings, said the researchers, since the associations were not necessarily causal.

For example, the paper said that the lower prescribing rate could be attributed to the strong emphasis on adherence to guidelines in the training of advanced practitioners, and to the availability of a wider range of forms of help, which may reduce the need for prescribed medication.

And the study said that ARRS staff may improve satisfaction, especially for patients with ongoing health conditions requiring regular monitoring and coordination, by providing more time with a broader care team.

Further research should explore whether specific ARRS roles, such as health and wellbeing coaches, drive improvements in satisfaction with long-term condition management, the researchers said.

Related Article: The future of GP pharmacy – sign up for the last few places at our free event

The study included data from more than 6,000 general practices between 2018 and 2022. The ARRS was introduced in England in 2019 to increase access to general practice.

A version of this article first appeared on our sister title Pulse PCN.

Tell us your experience of ARRS in our 2024 survey

The Pharmacist’s news team is looking to uncover the current state of play across the profession, both within community pharmacy and general practice. But we need your help.

Related Article: How new medicines become available on the NHS

Importantly, we want to better understand the real impact of the additional roles reimbursement scheme (ARRS).

Related Article: Weight loss jabs and the role of community pharmacy

We are keen to hear from both sides. Have pharmacists moved from community pharmacies into practices? Is this contributing to further pressures? We’d like to hear more about the other issues you are facing, and your on-the-ground experiences.

And what is the experience of practice pharmacists? What are your responsibilities and how has this changed over the last year? And what are the challenges you are facing?

Related Article: The future of GP pharmacy – sign up for the last few places at our free event

Take our survey here and you could win £100 vouchers of your choice

Want news like this straight to your inbox?
Sign up for our bulletins
Have your say

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.