CPhOs set to establish ‘collaborative’ Pharmacy Leadership Council

Pharmacy bodies respond to the report
RPS: We recognise our role needs to be different and more inclusive
The Royal Pharmaceutical Society said that it was ‘pleased to read that the co-chairs share our ambition for a more inclusive, supportive and collaborative approach.’
It added that the report and the response of the four Chief Pharmaceutical Officers would ‘require careful and detailed scrutiny’, and that it planned to ‘listen to our members and to pharmacy organisations and to understand everyone’s views on the findings and recommendations’, including via an additional Assembly meeting on 20 February.
An RPS spokesperson added: ‘We recognise our role in pharmacy professional leadership needs to be different and more inclusive.
Related Article: Anticoagulant Inhixa recalled due to typo
‘There is a need to create an agenda for reform with substantial changes that will stand the test of time. This will require RPS, and others, to spend time considering the most effective way of implementing transformational change.
‘Our commitment is to work collaboratively with our members, the wider pharmacy community and the Chief Pharmaceutical Officers to deliver the professional leadership our great profession deserves.’
APTUK: Pharmacy technicians must be enabled to lead
Claire Steele, president of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians UK (APTUK) commented: ‘APTUK acknowledges that pharmacy professional leadership needs to evolve to meet the rapidly changing needs of healthcare provision.
‘In doing so the pharmacy technician profession must be enabled to lead on matters pertaining to their profession, be fairly represented and listened to at all levels including relevant decision-making forums.’
NPA: Need to be ‘seriously engaged in the process of change’
Related Article: Dapagliflozin shows promise in progressive liver disease
The National Pharmacy Association’s director of corporate affairs, Gareth Jones, described the report as ‘a significant attempt to strengthen bridges across the profession and grow the standing of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, in line with evolving public expectations.’
He added: ‘If this is to be genuinely broad and inclusive, professionals working in community pharmacy - who form the large majority - must be seriously engaged in the process of change.’
‘As a major employer body and training provider, we look forward to playing our part in this reset of pharmacy professional leadership.’
PDA: The government does not own the pharmacy profession
The Pharmacists’ Defence Association said that it was still considering its initial response to the report, but said in a statement last week that ‘whilst the professional leadership function in pharmacy is in need of some urgent attention and a reset’, it wanted to remind the government ‘that it does not own the pharmacy profession’.
Related Article: New GPhC chief standards officer appointed
It added that the government, through the NHS, was the largest employer of pharmacists, and therefore should be mindful of potential conflicts of interest.
‘Any contribution to a discussion about the future of pharmacy professional leadership from the government/NHS is to be welcomed, but it must ultimately be for pharmacists to decide the future of their professional leadership,’ the PDA added.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.