Drug tariff reduction could ‘hamper’ Pharmacy First, CPE warns

Why will contractors receive less in medicines reimbursement this quarter?
The total figures estimated by CPE are based on the prices listed in the Drug Tariff multiplied by the expected dispensing volume over the next quarter.
Around £26m of the total reduction is due to changes in the market value of medicines, according to CPE estimates. The January Drug Tariff therefore reflects lower drug prices available according to market data gathered by DHSC.
Related Article: OBE award the ‘pinnacle of my career’ says community pharmacist
Another £3m of the total reduction is caused by new lines being included within Category M – such as more expensive branded medicines now being available as cheaper generics, and therefore being eligible for a lower reimbursement price.
One notable example is anticoagulant apixaban, which was previously only available as the branded medicine Eliquis but is now available as a generic, following a patent challenge by generics manufacturer Teva UK.
Any other adjustment in the overall value of reimbursement is decided by DHSC, based on the amount of margin already retained by the community pharmacy sector.
Related Article: ‘Streamlined’ DMS claims process to launch in July
Under the Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework (CPCF) 2019-24, the sector can retain £800m per year in margin generated from the purchasing and reimbursement of drugs.
Based on data provided confidentially by pharmacies and wholesalers (the Margin Survey), Category M reimbursement prices are adjusted throughout the year to align with the annual £800m retained margin target.
Related Article: RPS new director for England will build a ‘vibrant future’ for pharmacy
Based on over-delivery in previous quarters, the January Drug Tariff was expected to be adjusted to allow for a smaller retained margin this quarter.
The eventual £9m margin adjustment, following CPE lobbies, was less than expected, although the negotiator suggested that it did not go far enough and should not have been applied at all this month.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.