FIP disputes RPS claim on membership fee 

FIP disputes RPS claim on membership fee 
How to earn funds from the Quality Payments Scheme

The International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) has disputed some of the claims made by RPS in its open letter explaining its decision to leave FIP, announced last week (18 March). 

In a statement, published on its website this week (22 March), FIP said RPS’ claim that it paid a FIP membership fee of £31,000 annually was incorrect, by asserting the membership fee for 2022 was instead ‘approximately’ £25,352.  

The RPS’ letter to its members on 19 March, which explained the body's financial motives for leaving, also touched on the ‘an additional £53,000 in meeting attendance costs, travel and accommodation in 2019’ it had spent.   

Related Article: OBE award the ‘pinnacle of my career’ says community pharmacist

However, FIP claimed this figure was based on personal financial ‘choices made by the former member organisation’. 

It explained its membership fee for organisations works on a sliding scale based on ‘purchasing power parity or world bank classification of countries’. 

FIP said it had members in ‘all regions of the world’ including those in low-, middle- and high-income countries.  

The fee would currently work out to ‘less than £1 per member each year’ for RPS, it added. 

This comes after RPS members complained about the lack of transparency around the body's decision to leave FIP

It also follows media speculation from the pharmacy press, which claimed that Robbie Turner, RPS’s director of pharmacy, and Gail Fleming, its director of education, were to be made redundant

Related Article: ‘Streamlined’ DMS claims process to launch in July

RPS claimed it had ‘previously invited’ FIP to propose new ways to work with RPS to ‘improve the value and reduce the cost of membership’.  

However, the FIP statement claimed it was in fact holding ‘active discussions’ with the RPS during 2021 regarding the RPS’s ‘needs’ and how ‘value could be improved’.  

Therefore, FIP said it was ‘disappointed that this founding member voted that there was a lack of value in membership’. 

The statement said: ‘It is regretful that RPS has decided not to be a member of FIP in 2022, especially at a time when global solidarity on issues such as pharmacy workforce capacity, antimicrobial resistance, access to medicines and pharmaceutical care, and sustainability is so important,’ it said. 

Related Article: RPS new director for England will build a ‘vibrant future’ for pharmacy

Now is a time when ‘solidarity within the pharmacy profession is crucial’, it explained, while pointing to the coronavirus pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 

RPS has been approached for comment. 

Want news like this straight to your inbox?
Sign up for our bulletins
Readers Comments [1]
  1. Bindu Bhatt says:

    It appears that the RPS's executive is behaving in a dictatorial way and misleading the membrship. I have just renewed my membership befor all this came out, so too late to cancel it this year. In light of lack of transparency and the society being run by a cabal interested in furthering their own careers only, I will not be renewing my membership next year after over 40years of being a member. This organisation is not fit for purpose and needs to be done away with.
    The famous phrase that comes to mind is that they have been far too long in their position for any good they have done. In God's name please go.

    Reply moderated
Have your say

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.